This is going to be a random update of my life, plus my thoughts on the latest episode of Chuck (S4E9). The review is after the pagebreak so as not to spoil those who haven't watched it and want to watch (Or just so those not interested can just not click it)
Ah, just finished two exams in the past 2 days. New Media was really hard despite being all MCQ.. the options were all super close and the questions weren't easy. Especially the application questions..oh wow. Each were worth 4 marks each.. so like really damn stress to choose one option knowing that you could lose 4 marks there and then.
Today was PL1101E which has always been one of my stronger modules as well as the one I put the most effort in to.. So I thought it was quite manageable. I won't dare say I'll ace it so hard that they can't find a good enough grade for me (LOL that came out funny) , there WERE quite a few questions that I wasn't sure of and my essay was smokefest for abit. But.. manageable ba. Because I worked really hard for it. Hope I get my A :/
Last paper is on Monday!! ugh fml most people would have ended exams by then and I'll be the only sad person having a paper. PHILOOO. Have to immerse myself in the complicated inquisitive world of philosophy for the next 4 days. Maybe I'll make another philosophical post
Ok thoughts on Chuck after the page break
I liked how we finally had a 2 parter for Chuck! Like every time the action gets so intense and they get into such danger and trouble but at the back of your head you know everything will turn up fine so in the end there's no suspense or tension. Like, they're captured by enemy spies? Don't worry, they will escape, or someone will rescue them. They are have 10 guns pointed to their heads? Don't worry, they will disarm everyone in a high tempo fight synchronized with music.
It's always the same! That's something about Chuck that made the subsequent seasons more and more predictable and hence the action less and less enjoyable. I wouldn't mind a few cliffhangers like how the previous episode ended.
Anyway, while the whole 'giant she-man' thing was funny, it was also highly unrealistic? Like oh sure, a CIA spy easily beats 'the best fighter' of Thailand. Furthermore, the fight wasn't really realistic, I would expect a street fight like that to be more than just the typical roundhouse kicks style that Chuck always uses. There should be more grappling, locks, and of course dirty moves which was the only thing they got right (throwing sand into Sarah's eyes)
Want to know how to make a decent street fight? Think Prison Break Season 3, SONA. Now, THOSE fight scenes certainly get your adrenaline up and you are almost cringing from the violence but leaning forward to urge the protagonist on. Also, how Michael eventually won the fight was realistic too. (And even more necessary because he isn't supposed to be a fighter)
How the whole scene could have been improved was Sarah fighting her teeth out trying to beat the fighter, and actually losing eventually, but the whole idea of that scene should capture the desperate effort of Sarah to keep fighting to save Chuck. Then in the end the 'boss' will ask his fighter not to kill her but let her find Chuck. Much more emotional value!
Ok maybe my critique on this whole 'unrealistic fighting' is not ... 'accurate', because this was precisely the style that Chuck started with and it's meant to be like that (for comic value). But once in a while can throw in some stuff like what I suggested right? ^^
I also didn't like how Chuck woke up from his 'sleep'. Wasn't his memory supposed to be wiped out? How come everything is fine and dandy!? Oh sure, lobotomy is a reversible process. Just yank out the electrodes (?? another part that I thought was damn weird.. Like she wasn't worried that just yanking them out may actually cause damage to Chuck) and all the memory is restored.
I thought it would have been much better for Chuck to open his eyes.. then go "Who are you?" -to be continued-
SO MUCH BETTER!! THREE PARTER!! Ratings sure go up. hahaha.
Ok that's all I have to say for Chuck. I hope the scriptwriting stops being so predictable~
(btw the blog post title is a line that Chuck said during this episode, I guess it was intentional and so lame lol. 'I am just chuckful of surprises!' (I think the actual expression is 'chock-full' or maybe it really is 'chuck-full'. I've no idea how to spell it)
And on a random side note, loved the LOST references in HIMYM this week! 4 8 15 16 23 42 :D 6 numbers I will never forget haha. Ok that's all I have, I will see you guyssss(and girlsssss) next time!
Wednesday, 24 November 2010
Sunday, 21 November 2010
diamonds are forever
Finally got my last diamond in Starcraft 2! For 4v4! Was quite retarded, I had like 9 wins in a row and no promotion.. had a 26:6 win loss ratio. Then i lost one, then after the next win BAM promoted.
Diamond league in all categories :)
Top 40 in 1v1 diamond, 39 is my highest rank so far. Hope to climb to top 20 during the holidays! But have to get used to playing with my laptop cos i'll probably be visiting gf alot haha.
Read after page break for my rave about the new blogger interface!
Btw, draft.blogger's interface is damn nice? Looks so much better and i LOVE the new image adding functionality.. So much better than the old one, which was really buggy (when you insert image it puts it at the start of the post)
Now it inserts where you want it, and even after you upload you can just click it for a variety of resizing options! How cool is that! You must try it!
Why are they not making it the main interface? The one sucks man. Anyway, good job blogger, I was almost going to switch to wordpress and i discovered draft.blogger. :D
Ok, 2 more exams this week + 1 more next week and I'll climb to top 20 in my league in SC2!
EDIT: I just realised when i made the image large it would clash with my narrow space for my blog post and overlap onto the twitter side.. zz. Have to fix that soon. Sorry for small images!
EDIT EDIT: Oh cool stuff, you can click the image to view the full size image!! It didn't work when i clicked 'Preview'. Previously where got such function one!! NICE NICE BLOGGER LOVE LOVE
New feature for Facebook
I don't know if you are familiar with the '7 degrees of separation' hypothesis, which basically states that
"any 2 people in the world are separated by at most 7 degrees of separation."
This means that someone in Alaska could well be the friend of the cousin of the friend of the teacher of the pen pal of your sister's friend. In essence, you can connect any two people with such a line.
I don't know how accurate this hypothesis is, but when I think about it it seems pretty plausible to me. I mean, I'm sure it's a pretty common occurrence for Facebook users to go like 'Eh?! You know jane ah? she's from my secondary school!' which just shows the coverage of social networks.
Ok sorry that was a random digression about what I wanted to blog about. This post isn't about this 7 degrees of separation, but for a new feature for Facebook, that is, a 'Circle of Friends' or 'CoF' for short.
The perils of Facebook is well known to Communications and New Media students and basically any individual with common sense. If you upload something onto your Facebook, you must remember that it's very likely your future colleagues, or boss(es) may see it. Even the HR of the company you're applying for may run a Facebook sweep about you. (of course this last one may be protected if the HR are not your friends and you already have your privacy setting up to prevent non-friends from viewing your stuff..) Thus, there's the fear of uploading things that you WANT to upload.
How do we rectify this? Include a 'circles of friends' classification for Facebook!
Think of it as concentric circles, with the innermost circle being your closest circle of friends, the next circle being your close friends, the next circle being your normal friends, the next being your acquaintances, and the next being peopleyoubarelyknowbutwanttofriendyoubecausetheywannaboosttheirfacebookfriendscount. You get the idea.
Then your privacy settings will include how much you want each circle to see. For instance, everytime i upload a photo, I can select 'up to which degree of friends' do i want to allow to see those photos. There can be a default setting that simply 'allows all'.
This may sound troublesome to customize for those who don't care about what others see about them, so it can be an opt-in thing - if you don't want to utilize this feature, the default will just be the way things are now.
This feature can be called 'Circles of Friends' (CoF) and can be activated for various things besides photos - such as wall posts, sharing of links, videos. If you cant be bothered selecting who to allow to view your stuff everytime you perform an activity, it's ok! You just continue with your normal usage. If you ARE bothered, you activate the CoF for whichever function you want (e.g. wall posts) and everytime you make a wall post you select from a dropdown menu to which level you want to allow viewership of it, etc.
Oh, and of course your CoF settings for respective friends will be kept confidential, so your friends' feelings aren't hurt :p It can be a chore to get it up and running especially if you have like 12837 friends, but think of the benefits!
No more worrying about broadcasting personal (as in 'private', not personal as in yours) thoughts to seemingly any tom dick and harry on your FB list! No more worrying about your parents seeing your wild party photos! No more worrying about your colleagues finding out about your double life!
EDIT: http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2032030,00.html
Even more privacy issues with the 'See Friendship' feature allowing friends of friends to see your private photos! This can potentially bypass the CoF thing as well, so I think the See Friendship feature needs fixing eh. :@
"any 2 people in the world are separated by at most 7 degrees of separation."
This means that someone in Alaska could well be the friend of the cousin of the friend of the teacher of the pen pal of your sister's friend. In essence, you can connect any two people with such a line.
I don't know how accurate this hypothesis is, but when I think about it it seems pretty plausible to me. I mean, I'm sure it's a pretty common occurrence for Facebook users to go like 'Eh?! You know jane ah? she's from my secondary school!' which just shows the coverage of social networks.
Ok sorry that was a random digression about what I wanted to blog about. This post isn't about this 7 degrees of separation, but for a new feature for Facebook, that is, a 'Circle of Friends' or 'CoF' for short.
The perils of Facebook is well known to Communications and New Media students and basically any individual with common sense. If you upload something onto your Facebook, you must remember that it's very likely your future colleagues, or boss(es) may see it. Even the HR of the company you're applying for may run a Facebook sweep about you. (of course this last one may be protected if the HR are not your friends and you already have your privacy setting up to prevent non-friends from viewing your stuff..) Thus, there's the fear of uploading things that you WANT to upload.
How do we rectify this? Include a 'circles of friends' classification for Facebook!
Think of it as concentric circles, with the innermost circle being your closest circle of friends, the next circle being your close friends, the next circle being your normal friends, the next being your acquaintances, and the next being peopleyoubarelyknowbutwanttofriendyoubecausetheywannaboosttheirfacebookfriendscount. You get the idea.
Then your privacy settings will include how much you want each circle to see. For instance, everytime i upload a photo, I can select 'up to which degree of friends' do i want to allow to see those photos. There can be a default setting that simply 'allows all'.
This may sound troublesome to customize for those who don't care about what others see about them, so it can be an opt-in thing - if you don't want to utilize this feature, the default will just be the way things are now.
This feature can be called 'Circles of Friends' (CoF) and can be activated for various things besides photos - such as wall posts, sharing of links, videos. If you cant be bothered selecting who to allow to view your stuff everytime you perform an activity, it's ok! You just continue with your normal usage. If you ARE bothered, you activate the CoF for whichever function you want (e.g. wall posts) and everytime you make a wall post you select from a dropdown menu to which level you want to allow viewership of it, etc.
Oh, and of course your CoF settings for respective friends will be kept confidential, so your friends' feelings aren't hurt :p It can be a chore to get it up and running especially if you have like 12837 friends, but think of the benefits!
No more worrying about broadcasting personal (as in 'private', not personal as in yours) thoughts to seemingly any tom dick and harry on your FB list! No more worrying about your parents seeing your wild party photos! No more worrying about your colleagues finding out about your double life!
EDIT: http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2032030,00.html
Even more privacy issues with the 'See Friendship' feature allowing friends of friends to see your private photos! This can potentially bypass the CoF thing as well, so I think the See Friendship feature needs fixing eh. :@
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)